|
CATEGORY |
Excellent |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Needs
Improvement
|
|
Introduction (Organization) |
The introduction is inviting, states the main topic and previews
the structure of the paper. |
The introduction clearly states the main topic and previews
the structure of the paper, but is not particularly inviting to the reader. |
The introduction states the main topic, but does not
adequately preview the structure of the paper nor is it particularly inviting
to the reader. |
There is no clear introduction of the main topic or structure
of the paper. |
|
Sequencing (Organization) |
Details are placed in a logical order and the way they are
presented effectively keeps the interest of the reader. |
Details are placed in a logical order, but the way in
which they are presented/introduced sometimes makes the writing less interesting.
|
Some details are not in a logical or expected order, and
this distracts the reader. |
Many details are not in a logical or expected order. There
is little sense that the writing is organized. |
|
Accuracy of Facts (Content) |
All supportive facts are reported accurately. |
Almost all supportive facts are reported accurately. |
Most supportive facts are reported accurately. |
NO facts are reported OR most are inaccurate. |
|
Conclusion (Organization) |
The conclusion is strong and leaves a feeling that we understand
what the writer is "getting at." |
The conclusion is recognizable and ties up almost all the
loose ends. |
The conclusion is recognizable, but does not tie up several
loose ends. |
There is no clear conclusion, the paper just ends. |
|
Sentence Length (Sentence Fluency) |
Every paragraph has sentences that vary in length. |
Almost all paragraphs have sentences that vary in length. |
Some sentences vary in length. |
Sentences rarely vary in length. |
|
Transitions (Organization) |
A variety of thoughtful transitions are used. They clearly
show how ideas are connected. |
Transitions clearly show how ideas are connected, but
there is little variety. |
Some transitions work well; but connections between other
ideas are fuzzy. |
The transitions between ideas are unclear or nonexistant. |
|
Word Choice |
Writer uses vivid words and phrases that linger or draw
pictures in the reader's mind, and the choice and placement of the words
seems accurate, natural and not forced. |
Writer uses vivid words and phrases that linger or draw
pictures in the reader's mind, but occasionally the words are used inaccurately
or seem overdone. |
Writer uses words that communicate clearly, but the writing
lacks variety, punch or flair. |
Writer uses a limited vocabulary that does not communicate
strongly or capture the reader's interest. Jargon or cliches may be present
and detract from the meaning. |
|
Sentence Structure (Sentence Fluency) |
All sentences are well-constructed with varied structure. |
Most sentences are well-constructed with varied structure.
|
Most sentences are well-constructed but have a similar
structure. |
Sentences lack structure and appear incomplete or
rambling. |
|
Grammar & Spelling (Conventions) |
Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distract
the reader from the content. |
Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling that
distract the reader from the content. |
Writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract
the reader from the content. |
Writer makes more than 4 errors in grammar or spelling
that distract the reader from the content. |
|
Date Created: 2002-01-21 |
|
|